Massachusetts DUI Lawyer Blog

Last month, I wrote about the use of ignition interlock devices in Massachusetts drunk driving cases. Under Melanie's Law, courts may order repeat OUI offenders to install these mobile breathalyzers in their vehicles, at their own expense. The devices were originally hailed as an effective way to stop drunk driving, but as I wrote in January, citizens and Massachusetts OUI defense attorneys have raised significant questions about their effectiveness, reliability and safety.

Now, a report from the Record of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada suggests that ignition interlock devices may someday be outmoded by a new technology. The Feb. 12 article says Sober Steering Sensors Canada Inc. is developing a type of chemical sensor that can detect what it calls the gas byproducts of alcohol though a person's skin. The company is developing a steering wheel that incorporates the sensors. As with IIDs, the system would not allow the vehicle to start if it detects a high BAC. The Record said the company is already testing the technology in "fleet" vehicles, including buses and large trucks. Both MADD and the auto insurance industry have expressed interest, and the company's founder was slated to talk to Florida's state legislature about the technology Feb. 15.

The article said Sober Steering's product may improve on IIDs for several reasons. IIDs require a "clean" breath test before they allow the vehicle to start. Drivers can get around this by having another person take the test. For this reason, IIDs also require a "rolling retest," which means retaking the breath test while the vehicle is in motion. Critics believe this is not safe, especially since the car can shut down in traffic if the driver can't find a safe place to pull over and take the test. The Sober Steering technology can take rolling retests without the driver having to do anything but keep his or her hands on the wheel. Sober Steering claims its technology can tell the difference between alcohol consumption and alcohol from hand sanitizer, mouthwash or other products, a common criticism of breathalyzers. And the cost of installing it is a sixth to a tenth of the cost of an IID, the article said.

As a Massachusetts drunk driving criminal defense lawyer, I agree that this could solve some of the drawbacks of IIDs, though not all of them. (Drivers could still illegally borrow someone else's car, for example.) But I believe states and provinces should take a hard look at the technology before rushing to adopt it. For example, how finely tuned is the technology? Can it tell when a driver is wearing gloves? Can it consistently distinguish between a legal BAC of 0.07 and an illegal 0.08? Serious flaws, like the well-documented problems with breathalyzers, could allow defendants to fight their cases. Another concern has to do with the constitutional right of defendants to face their accusers. In cases of drunk driving, the test device is generally considered the "accuser," which has led to court cases, successful in some states, demanding that the source code behind breathalyzer machines be publicly released. If Sober Steering's technology will be used in the United States, the company should release its technology to allow defendants to build the best possible defenses.

The Law Offices of Stephen Neyman represents clients throughout eastern Massachusetts who are charged with operating under the influence and related crimes. If you're facing charges, don't hesitate to contact us for help. For a free phone consultation, please call (617) 263-6800 or send a message through the Web site.

State Senator Anthony Galluccio is headed to jail, the Boston Herald reported Jan. 4. Galluccio, a Democrat elected to represent Cambridge will serve a year in jail in connection with an Oct. 4 hit-and-run accident he admits to causing. That crash caused only minor injuries to a father and teenaged son, but Galluccio left the scene. He did not turn himself in until the next day, making it impossible to test him for alcohol, but he has two past OUIs (one pardoned) and a past accident. When Galluccio was sentenced for the hit-and-run, Judge Matthew Nestor gave him six months of home confinement with exceptions for Senate votes and church, on the condition that he not drink and submit to random alcohol testing. His driver's license was also revoked for five years.

That sentence was handed down Dec. 18. On Dec. 21, a probation department employee came to install an alcohol-testing device called a Sobrietor in Galluccio's home. Right after installation, the device detected alcohol on Galluccio's breath. The senator said he hadn't had any alcohol and suggested that sorbitol, an artificial sweeter in toothpaste, may have been the culprit. Despite testimony from an expert witness, Nestor said he believed Galluccio had been drinking. He revoked Galluccio's probation and sent him to jail for a year. Senate President Therese Murray issued a statement suggesting that Galluccio will lose his job if he does not resign.

Read article: Embattled Galluccio gets 1 year in jail

Galluccio's suggestion that toothpaste may have set off the Sobrietor is attracting ridicule in some circles. The Boston Herald even went so far as to test the theory, using a home breathalyzer kit. But Massachusetts OUI criminal defense lawyers already know that toothpaste, mouthwash and other alcohol-containing substances can give a false positive on a breathalyzer test, even though the person may in fact be sober. As the Herald's test shows, taking a reading directly after brushing your teeth, sipping a beer, belching or more can produce high readings, which fall off dramatically in a few minutes. This is because of residual alcohol in the mouth. Breathalyzers are supposed to work by testing the alcohol in the air expelled from the person's lungs, then using an equation to calculate BAC. Using the same equation for the much higher amount of mouth alcohol can produce a very high but temporary reading.

This is why law enforcement officers are supposed to observe the driver for 15 minutes before administering a breathalyzer -- to ensure that enough time has passed since the last drink to avoid a false positive. Failure to do this, or to follow several other procedures, can make the evidence tainted or suspect. When this is the case, an experienced Massachusetts drunk driving defense attorney will ask the judge to leave that evidence out of the case entirely. In effect, this substantially weakens the prosecution's case, because without a BAC reading, it is much more difficult to prove that the defendant operated a motor vehicle while intoxicated.

Continue reading "Galluccio Sentenced to One Year in Jail for Failing Home Confinement Alcohol Test" »

A man from Taunton was arrested in that town for driving drunk and flying into a rage after his arrest, the Taunton Gazette reported Oct. 7. The article does not specify the circumstances behind the DUI charge against Raymond Butler, 45. But after his arrest and placement in the back of a police car, the article says, the arresting officer said Butler began screaming, banging his head against the window. The officer also said Butler used profanity and crude sexual references, and threatened to claim that the officer assaulted him.

He later complained that his pacemaker was bothering him, so police called an ambulance. When EMTs arrived, Butler allegedly screamed at them and flailed so much that he struck one of them. When he arrived at the hospital, he allegedly screamed vulgarities at hospital staff, threatened a nurse and pulled an IV out of his arm. He was charged with operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol; having an open container in his vehicle; threatening to commit a crime; disturbing the peace; assault and battery on ambulance personnel; and disorderly conduct.

Read article: Taunton man flies into rage after OUI arrest

The evidence of Butler's disruptive behavior could make this case difficult for a Massachusetts DUI defense attorney, but not necessarily because he was guilty of driving while intoxicated. It is not clear from the article whether the police have solid evidence against Butler, and what that evidence might be. (If the description in the article is accurate, Butler may have refused the breathalyzer test, making it more difficult to prove intoxication.) But even a strong defense may not impress a jury when evidence suggests the defendant was hostile. Even though the charges stemming from that behavior are separate from the DUI charge, juries may incorrectly believe they support the idea that the defendant was driving drunk. Depending on the other evidence in the case, an experienced Massachusetts OUI defense lawyer may consider suggesting a guilty plea in exchange for a 24D sentence (alternative disposition) that lowers the penalties considerably.

Continue reading "Taunton Massachusetts Driver Charged With Assaulting Emergency Workers in OUI Arrest" »

A driver pulled over in Natick, Massachusetts was driving while intoxicated and going more than twice the speed limit, MetroWest Daily News reported Oct. 6. Jason Michael Harvey, 29, was stopped for excessive speed around 2 a.m. on Route 9. The speed limit in the area is 45 mph; an officer using speed radar clocked Harvey at 91 mph. Harvey, of Framingham, admitted that he had been drinking alcohol, and an officer found an open bottle of vodka in his large, 12- to 15-passenger van. A Breathalyzer test at the scene found Harvey had a blood-alcohol concentration of 0.21, more than twice the 0.08 legal limit in Massachusetts. Harvey was charged with OUI, driving to endanger, driving with an open container of alcohol, driving on a suspended license, speeding and failure to wear a seat belt. He pleaded not guilty at an Oct. 5 arraignment.

Read article: Framingham man charged with driving twice the speed limit in Natick

As a Massachusetts DUI defense attorney, I frequently hear from clients in situations like Harvey's who feel that their cases are hopeless. If the police have a BAC reading, the logic goes, there must be no way they can fight the charge. While it's true that failing a breathalyzer test can be strong evidence in a drunk driving case, failing a breathalyzer is not proof that the accused was truly operating under the influence of liquor. As I explain on my Web site's breathalyzer page, test results may be inadmissible at trial if the police did not follow certain procedures designed to keep the evidence from being tainted. In fact, the law says police must watch the accused for fifteen minutes before administering a breathalyzer, because certain digestive problems and eating or drinking certain things can throw off the test results.

Among the foods and drinks that can throw off test results is alcohol itself. Breathalyzers estimate BAC by calculating the amount of alcohol on a person's breath. When the person being tested has drunk some alcohol moments before, he or she likely still has alcohol in the mouth -- which can give off fumes. Those fumes can disrupt the breathalyzer reading, giving it a falsely high test result. The report notes that Harvey had an open bottle of vodka in his van, suggesting that he may have been drinking right before he was pulled over. If that's the case, and the officer did not wait 15 minutes to administer the test, the breathalyzer results may be inadmissible in court -- weakening the DUI case considerably. This doesn't affect the other charges in Harvey's case, of course, but an experienced Massachusetts drunk driving defense lawyer can substantially reduce the penalties he faces with defenses like these.

Continue reading "Police Arrest Framingham Massachusetts Man on Speeding and Drunk Driving Charges" »

Last week Nancy Toledo of Braintree, Massachusetts was stopped for having a defective taillight. Once stopped the police officer observed signs consistent with alcohol and drug use. Toledo was asked to perform some Field Sobriety Tests. According to reports Toledo took the tests and failed. She was transported to the police station where she was given the Breathalyzer Test. She failed this too. She was charged with OUI Drugs and Alcohol. Toledo was also charged with Resisting Arrest. After the defendant's car was searched more charges were added; Possession of Drugs and Drinking from an Open Container. The case will be prosecuted in the Quincy District Court.

Read Article:

Massachusetts Woman Fails Breathalyzer Test, Field Sobriety Tests And Gets Charged With DUI Drugs, Alcohol

Assuming the taillight was in fact defective and stop was constitutionally permissible Toledo's best option might be to admit to sufficient facts and enter the "24D" program. There she will be placed on probation for one year. She will have to enter and complete an alcohol awareness program, pay some fines and lose her license for forty five days. She will be eligible for a hardship license assuming she meets the criteria set out by the Registry of Motor Vehicles. She may also have to undergo some drug counseling if the judge believes she might have a substance abuse problem. Successfully trying this case will be a challenge due to the presence of drugs, the failed field sobriety tests and the failed breathalyzer test.

Continue reading "Braintree Massachusetts Woman Arrested And Charged With OUI Drugs, Alcohol" »

Last Friday Peter Koshivas of Holliston, Massachusetts crashed his Honda Civic into a tree just after 1:00 in the morning. His passenger, Benjamin Snow was injured in the crash and taken to the hospital by helicopter. Police stated that both Koshivas and Snow are luck to be alive. Koshivas will be charged with OUI Serious Bodily Injury, Reckless Driving and related Motor Vehicle Charges. The case will be prosecuted in the Framingham District Court. The article was not specific on the details of the crash.

Read Article:

Holliston, Massachusetts Man Who Injured Friend In Crash To Be Prosecuted For DUI, Other Motor Vehicle Crimes

The article reported that Koshivas was also injured in the crash. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that he never took the field sobriety tests nor did he take a breathalyzer test. I would imagine that blood was taken from him at the hospital and that it has been tested for the presence of alcohol. As I have mentioned in prior posts the blood must be taken and tested in certain ways to avoid the possibility of a false positive result. Absent any eyewitness testimony the prosecution will probably base its case on Koshivas' blood test results and an accident reconstruction. The accident reconstruction simply buttresses the district attorney's case provided they have an alcohol sample that reads a .08 or higher. If not, the OUI aspect of this case is harder to prove.

Continue reading "Holliston Massachusetts Man Involved In Crash Charged With OUI Serious Bodily Injury In Framingham Court" »

The Gloucester Daily Times reported that two days ago Mark Hargrave, 55 of Hamilton, Massachusetts was arrested and charged with Second Offense OUI after being pulled over on Route 128 Southbound. Hargrave was also charged with failing to stay within marked lanes and Failure to Stop for a Police Officer. The case is now pending in the Salem District Court.

Read Article:

Second Offense Operating Under The Influence Charged Against Hamilton, Massachusetts Man

While there is a tremendous amount of detail missing from this article there may be a silver lining for Hargrave's case. If he refused to take the Field Sobriety Tests and if he refused to take the Breathalyzer Test then the only case against him is likely the police officer's observations. Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyers are able to quickly educate jurors about the commonality of police officers' testimonies in cases like this one. The officer will offer the following at trial: 1) that he observed the defendant operating his vehicle in an erratic manner; 2) that when he made the stop of the driver he smelled the odor of alcohol on his breath; 3) the he did not properly respond to the officer's commands; 4) that he appeared unsteady on his feet; 5) that his speech was slurred and 6) that his eyes were red and bloodshot. The defense attorney will show the jury how these subjective observations are common to all officer stops. Almost every OUI police report that I have seen reports this same pattern of detail for the "run of the mill" drunk driving case. This testimony is impeachable and jurors immediately see the doubt in the prosecutor's case. If Hargrave was not impaired he will produce witnesses with whom he was with prior to the arrest and whom he contacted after the arrest to vouch for his sobriety. Cases like this one are usually very triable.

Continue reading "Hamilton Massachusetts Man Charged With OUI Second Offense After Stop On Route 128 South" »

Last weekend just before 1:00 a.m. Jacqueline Boutin was driving her husband Michael and Peter Colangelo off of Route 140 when she noticed a car rapidly approaching her from behind. The trailing car that was being operated by Colleen Imgemanson ended up hitting Boutin's car and knocking it on its side. Michael Boutin was temporarily trapped but was quickly extricated by the Taunton, Massachusetts Fire Department. It took longer to free Colangelo who was airlifted to the Boston Medical Center where he ultimately died. Boutin and her husband sustained injuries requiring a brief hospitalization at the Morton Hospital. A Taunton police officer responded to the scene after receiving reports that a woman had fled the crash on foot. He then observed Ingemanson walking unsteadily not far from the crash site. Ingemanson admitted to having driven the car. The officer reported that she smelled of alcohol and that she could not pass the field sobriety tests that were administered. Her eyes were bloodshot and her speech was slurred. She refused to take the breathalyzer test. Ingemanson has been charged with Motor Vehicle Homicide While OUI, OUI Second Offense. Leaving the Scene of an Accident with Death Resulting, Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle and Leaving the Scene with Personal Injury. Charges are now pending in the Taunton District Court.

Read Article:

Massachusetts Woman Looking At Motor Vehicle Charges, OUI After Fatal Accident

Cases like this one are very difficult to defend. Even if the defendant has a valid defense to the OUI Charge the charge of Leaving the Scene of An Accident With Personal Injury or Death will result in a one year minimum mandatory jail sentence. It is probable that the district attorney in this case will be indicting this case and prosecuting it in the Superior Court. There, if convicted the judge can sentence the defendant to a state prison sentence. The district attorney's office will undoubtedly be looking for a state prison sentence after a conviction. Even if the defendant wants to plead guilty a state prison sentence will be strongly considered by the judge.

Continue reading "Taunton Massachusetts Woman Facing OUI Motor Vehicle Charges After Drunk Driving Accident Kills 48 Year Old Man" »

This past Saturday Nicko Castaneda was driving a Saturn in Framingham, Massachusetts. Just after 3:00 p.m. Castaneda rear ended a man on a motorcycle on School Street. Apparently the man was attempting to take a turn into the Walgreen's parking lot on that street. The impact of the crash sent the victim about seventy two feet before it and the Saturn stopped. The motorcycle was found partially underneath Castaneda's car. When the police arrived at the accident scene they noticed that Castaneda had trouble standing. He admitted to drinking eight beers. A breathalyzer test was administered. The result showed that Castaneda had a blood alcohol content of .21, more than two and one half times the legal limit. The victim suffered serious injuries. Castaneda was charged with OUI Second Offense, OUI Serious Bodily Injury and Operating to Endanger. The case is pending in the Framingham District Court. Bail was set at one thousand dollars.

Read Article:

Framingham Man Charged With Second Offense DUI

Castaneda is in a lot of trouble. Just this past February he was convicted of his First Offense OUI in the Dedham District Court. For that case the best scenario would have been a "24D" disposition wherein the case was continued without a finding for one year and certain statutorily mandated probationary conditions. Now however the probation department in Dedham will likely move to surrender Castaneda. A judge can convert the continuance without a finding to a guilty and impose a two and one half year jail sentence. On the new case the defendant is looking at a second offender disposition or a mandatory thirty day jail sentence and a potential two and one half year jail sentence.

Continue reading "Framingham Massachusetts Man Charged With OUI Serious Bodily Injury " »

Former NFL defensive lineman Bruce Smith was convicted of DUI and the charge of refusing to take a breathalyzer test by a Virginia Beach judge. As a result Smith was given a ninety day suspended sentence. He will also lose his license for twelve months. During the trial Smith claimed that he had difficulty taking and adequately performing the field sobriety tests due to a list of injuries he suffered during his NFL career. The judge believed that Smith's level of intoxication prevented him from following the police officer's instructions on how to take the field sobriety tests. The arresting officer testified that Smith was speeding and that when he pulled him over he smelled a strong odor of alcohol on his breath. Smith's eyes were bloodshot and glassy.

There is an interesting twist to this case. The officer who arrested Smith was subsequently arrested and charged with DUI as well. The officer crashed his car and failed three out of four field sobriety tests that were administered. Evidence of the pending DUI charges was not admissible against the officer.

Read Article:

Bruce Smith Convicted Of DUI On Testimony Of Officer Also Charged With DUI

Here is a question. Why was the fact that the arresting officer had a pending DUI charge inadmissible at Smith's trial? The prosecutor claimed that the crime of DUI does not affect a witness' credibility. While that might be true in most cases it should not be in this DUI case. We know that the arresting officer failed three out of four of his field sobriety tests on his case. That officer has pleaded not guilty, thus maintaining his innocence. Suppose the officer believes that he adequately performed his field sobriety tests notwithstanding a subjective opinion to the contrary. If that is the case then it seems to me that a judge should have allowed questioning of the officer on this issue. This would enable Smith to show that when this officer behaved in the same manner the officer believed that he was not impaired. Consequently, Smith could argue that similar behavior manifested on his part does not amount to a credible opinion that he was impaired. In other words, the arresting officer's opinion that he passed the field sobriety tests and Smith failed is a matter of credibility that Smith should have been able to make known to a jury.

Continue reading "Hall Of Famer Bruce Smith Convicted Of DUI" »

Over the holiday weekend Jason Spurlin was driving with his girlfriend, Amanda Murray and two others, Anna Dubois and Nick Kelly. According to the police he was drunk and speeding. He lost control of his car around 1:15 in the morning, left the road and struck a tree. Spurlin survived but all passengers were killed. Apparently Murray and Spurlin have a five week old child together. Spurlin will now likely have to face three counts of Motor Vehicle Homicide. At least for now the case will be prosecuted in the Wrentham District Court.

Read Article:

Three Killed In Massachusetts Drunk Driving Accident, Driver To Face OUI Motor Vehicle Homicide Charges

The biggest question raised by this article is how did the police determine that Spurlin was drunk at the time of the accident. There is no mention of a breathalyzer test or field sobriety tests nor is there any indication that there exist any witnesses to the accident. It is likely that if Spurlin was injured during the crash he was taken to the hospital. There, his blood might have been taken as is often the case when people get admitted to the hospital. While these tests are the most reliable forms of evaluating a person's blood alcohol level they certainly are not infallible. Not all technicians are properly trained in taking the blood sample particularly in the case where they might be looking to test for alcohol. For instance, if yeast in introduced into the blood sample it might yield an inaccurate high false positive reading. Contaminated tubing can effect the reading. Improper labeling of the sample can be problematic. Swabbing with alcohol will often result in a high reading that lacks accuracy. If blood is the determining factor in Spurlin's case there is no doubt that his attorney will scrutinize the process by which the blood was taken and analyzed.

Continue reading "Drunk Driver Kills Three In Massachusetts, Will Get Charged With Motor Vehicle Homicide While OUI" »

Law enforcement authorities allege that David Dibenedetto of Carver, Massachusetts was involved in a car crash in Hanson yesterday. Apparently the police received a call about the crash and were able to locate Dibenedetto a short distance away in the town of Pembroke. Dibenedetto was arrested and charged with OUI, Second Offense, Leaving the Scene of an Accident, driving with a revoked license and negligent operation of a motor vehicle. He is being held at the Plymouth County Jail on a two thousand dollar cash bail.

Read Article:

Second Offense DUI For Southeastern Massachusetts Man Involved In An Accident

A two thousand dollar cash bail is considered high for a second offense OUI in general. However, usually when an accident occurs bail will increase. If you leave the scene after an accident and are charged with DUI in Massachusetts then you can bet the bail will be even higher. Given the circumstances of this case this bail is quite reasonable. For the second offense Dibenedetto is looking at a thirty day minimum mandatory jail sentence. If he is convicted of the leaving the scene as well as the OUI it would not surprise me to see some additional time added to the sentence. Here are some factors that will no doubt come into play when deciding whether or not to take this case to trial. Was there a breathalyzer test taken and what was the result? Did Dibenedetto take any field sobriety tests? What did the civilian witnesses see? How did the accident occur?

Continue reading "Massachusetts Man Charged With OUI 2nd, Leaving The Scene" »

Law enforcement in Florida uses a breath alcohol testing machine called the Intoxilyzer. The machine is developed by a company known as CMI Inc. Recently lawyers in Florida have asked judges to order the prosecution to disclose the software source code of the machines so that they can assess whether these machines are providing results that are accurate. While several judges in Florida and other states have ordered the disclosure of the proprietary coding CMI has refused to provide the requested information. The company has complained that such disclosure would give up "trade secrets". The judges ordering disclosure however have stated that a defendant has the right to examine evidence in order to properly prepare for trial. The result has been a backlog of OUI cases in those counties where there has not been compliance with the judicial orders.

Read Article:

Breathalyzer Manufacturer's Refusal To Comply With Court Orders Likely To Compromise OUI Cases

Massachusetts uses the Alcotest 7110 Mark III-C breathalyzer test. The machine consists of a breath tube, a deep lung air monitor, a sample chamber and an infrared sensor. In 2007 the Alcotest 7110 was tested by Base One Technologies, Inc. after a court case involving the Alcotest manufacturer required it provide its code. The study revealed that the code contained several errors. Read about the study here. In Massachusetts however you rarely see challenges to breathalyzer machine results. The reason for this is simple. The cost of retaining an expert to examine and evaluate the machine and provide testimony to a jury is extreme. Very few people can afford this and they look to the alternative of pleading guilty or trying the case by relying on their lawyer's cross-examination skills to attack the accuracy of the test. It is far easier to succeed in persuading a jury that a test is inaccurate with an expert than without one. I would expect to see a scientific challenge in Massachusetts to the Alcotest at some point in the future.

Continue reading "Breathalyzer Test Litigation Causing Delays In Prosecuting DUI Cases In Some States, Could Massachusetts Be Next?" »

Owen Schmitt is slated to be the Seattle Seahawks starting fullback this season. He is a fifth round draft pick from West Virginia going into his second season in the National Football League. Last weekend Schmitt was arrested and charged with drunk driving or OUI as it is called in Massachusetts. Officers observed Schmitt's vehicle weaving and following other cars too closely. He was pulled over at which time the police noted the smell of alcohol. Schmitt submitted to performing field sobriety tests. He failed those tests and took the breathalyzer test. The results exceeded a .08.

Read Article:

NFL Player Arrested And Charged With OUI

The consequences of a first offense OUI in Washington are much more severe than in Massachusetts. There is a mandatory sentence of at least one day for a conviction of this crime. There is no mandatory minimum period of incarceration in Massachusetts for the same offense. Washington has a mandatory ninety day loss of license. Massachusetts' is half that long. You must install an ignition interlock device after a first offense conviction in Washington. This is not the case in Massachusetts. One aspect of Washington law that is more favorable than in Massachusetts is the look back provision for prior offenses. Washington has a seven year look back whereas Massachusetts considers any prior conviction in calculating what offense is being charged.

Continue reading "Seattle Seahawks Fullback Charged With DUI" »

For Easton, Massachusetts Police Sergeant James McAvoy last Saturday morning was a first. He observed two motor vehicles both operating at a high rate of speed around 2:00 a.m. He stopped both vehicles. One was driven by Silvano Dossantos of Quincy, Massachusetts and the other by Christina Conway of Easton, Massachusetts. According to McAvoy, both were operating under the influence of alcohol (OUI), driving recklessly and speeding. It was reported that McEvoy was on patrol when he noticed the cars speeding and driving close to one another. He estimated the speed to be around seventy miles per hour. Charges are now pending in the Taunton District Court.

Read Article:

Massachusetts Woman And Friend Following Each Other Home Both Arrested For DUI

Aside from the speeding this article offers nothing relative to evidence of impairment due to the effects of alcohol. There is no mention of either of these women taking a breathalyzer test or field sobriety tests. Reading this report would be interesting. Most DUI defense lawyers in Massachusetts and other states will tell you the same thing. DUI police reports appear to be boilerplate. You can often tell which officer wrote the report just by reading the first paragraph in the narrative. I have said on numerous occasions that keeping a record of police officer DUI reports would be the best cross-examination tool for defense lawyers. The reports typically contain the following information: 1) that the operator was either operating at a high rate of speed or weaving over the marked lanes, 2) that after the stop the officer approached the vehicle and immediately detected a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage, 3) that the suspect had difficulty producing his license and registration, 4) that he asked the operator to get out of the vehicle and when doing so the operator was unsteady on his feet and 5) that the individual had bloodshot and glassy eyes. Police officers also have another group of facts in their reports that pertain to the defendant's performance taking the field sobriety tests. These too are seemingly boilerplate. I will share these in another blog post. I expect and hope that there will be a day in the not too distant future when Massachusetts DUI Defense Lawyers will collect and share these police reports and expose the routine and often questionable nature of police officer testimony in OUI cases.

Continue reading "Two Massachusetts Women Stopped At Same Time Both Charged With OUI" »